iNDICA NEWS BUREAU
A defiant activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan Thursday quoted Mahatma Gandhi to tell India’s Supreme Court “Í do not ask for mercy”.
Bhushan, a distinguished legal mind in India, had August 14 been held guilty by the country’s Supreme Court for two tweets he had posted. The court Thursday declined to accept Bhushan’s submission that another bench should hear the arguments on quantum of sentence in the case.
The case has come to be seen as a test for freedom of expression in the India during the regime of prime minister Narendra Modi, though the judiciary in India is deemed independent of the government.
In one of the two tweets judged as contemptuous, Bhushan had tweeted a photograph of Bobde on a Harley Davidson motorcycle and in the other Bhushan had alleged that democracy had been destroyed in India during the last six years under the last four Chief Justices.
Bhushan had also offered to the court to provide proof of his allegations.
A contemnor in India can be punished with simple imprisonment of up to six months or with a fine of up to Rs 2,000 or with both.
Here is what Prashant Bhushan, whose conviction has been criticized by several legal luminaries in India, Thursday told the country’s Supreme Court, as published in various Indian media outlets:
“I have gone through the judgment of this Hon’ble Court. I am pained that I have been held guilty of committing contempt of the Court whose majesty I have tried to uphold – not as a courtier or cheerleader but as a humble guard – for over three decades, at some personal and professional cost. I am pained, not because I may be punished, but because I have been grossly misunderstood.
I am shocked that the court holds me guilty of “malicious, scurrilous, calculated attack” on the institution of administration of justice. I am dismayed that the Court has arrived at this conclusion without providing any evidence of my motives to launch such an attack. I must confess that I am disappointed that the court did not find it necessary to serve me with a copy of the complaint on the basis of which the suo motu notice was issued, nor found it necessary to respond to the specific averments made by me in my reply affidavit or the many submissions of my counsel.
I find it hard to believe that the Court finds my tweet “has the effect of destabilising the very foundation of this important pillar of Indian democracy”. I can only reiterate that these two tweets represented my bonafide beliefs, the expression of which must be permissible in any democracy. Indeed, public scrutiny is desirable for healthy functioning of judiciary itself. I believe that open criticism of any institution is necessary in a democracy, to safeguard the constitutional order.
We are living through that moment in our history when higher principles must trump routine obligations, when saving the constitutional order must come before personal and professional niceties, when considerations of the present must not come in the way of discharging our responsibility towards the future. Failing to speak up would have been a dereliction of duty, especially for an officer of the court like myself.
My tweets were nothing but a small attempt to discharge what I considered to be my highest duty at this juncture in the history of our republic. I did not tweet in a fit of absence mindedness. It would be insincere and contemptuous on my part to offer an apology for the tweets that expressed what was and continues to be my bonafide belief.
Therefore, I can only humbly paraphrase what the father of the nation Mahatma Gandhi had said in his trial: I do not ask for mercy. I do not appeal to magnanimity.
I am here, therefore, to cheerfully submit to any penalty that can lawfully be inflicted upon me for what the Court has determined to be an offence, and what appears to me to be the highest duty of a citizen.”